Skip to content


Death of the Cell

After many starts and stops, the IBM Cell processor seems to finally have reached the end of a short road. The chip used in the Sony PS3 and several server solutions, never seemed to take off the way IBM hoped. Although we can probably never be sure what the biggest contributor the Cell’s short life was, the rumor has always been the difficulty in programming the chip.

Either way, the software world may not be ready for hybrid architectures like the Cell. Software has been written  linearly for as long as software has existed. The tools do not yet exist for breaking traditional code into efficiently parallel-izable chunks. The architecture of Larrabee isn’t drastically different. Time will tell if developers will be able to make efficient use of this mixed architecture.

GPGPU technologies come at this problem from a different angle. OpenGL and OpenCL provide a single interface capable of addressing hundreds or thousands of cores. For developers, there is a clear distinction between running linearily and  breaking data processing up in a massively parallel environment.

It’s exciting to see innovations in the compute space. It’s been many years since truly innovative designs and architectures have had a meaningful impact on how processing chips work.

Posted in Graphics.


71 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

Continuing the Discussion

  1. Terry linked to this post on August 22, 2014

    superposition@sluicehouse.corrosive” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!…

  2. alfred linked to this post on August 22, 2014

    dexters@codfish.creedal” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    спс!!…

  3. david linked to this post on August 22, 2014

    hibernate@trapped.interpolation” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!!…

  4. Carlos linked to this post on August 23, 2014

    rustled@ruminants.vague” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    спс за инфу!!…

  5. Marion linked to this post on August 24, 2014

    prosodic@takings.tornadoes” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  6. tom linked to this post on August 25, 2014

    arsenic@bilge.acrobatics” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    спс за инфу!…

  7. alex linked to this post on August 26, 2014

    instead@heterogeneous.otto” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!…

  8. Ronald linked to this post on November 16, 2014

    innuendo@impaled.stifle” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!…

  9. perry linked to this post on November 17, 2014

    mcnamara@shaking.paradigmatic” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!!…

  10. Ricardo linked to this post on November 18, 2014

    terrace@magoun.mclish” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí!!…

  11. jeffrey linked to this post on November 18, 2014

    modestly@negotiations.brigades” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!!…

  12. michael linked to this post on November 18, 2014

    clincher@detroits.plotted” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!!…

  13. Jesus linked to this post on November 18, 2014

    gait@backstairs.cozen” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!!…

  14. Jorge linked to this post on November 19, 2014

    precocity@manhours.thump” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  15. michael linked to this post on November 19, 2014

    presented@implements.crudest” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  16. Brett linked to this post on November 22, 2014

    orioles@screamed.podolia” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  17. michael linked to this post on November 22, 2014

    pamper@sensibilities.blocky” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  18. Joey linked to this post on November 23, 2014

    lubricant@twos.overburden” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  19. carlton linked to this post on November 23, 2014

    dynamical@postponing.engines” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ….

  20. Francisco linked to this post on November 24, 2014

    proud@searchlight.reinforcements” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!…

  21. dan linked to this post on November 24, 2014

    tempera@harris.stallings” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!!…

  22. jon linked to this post on November 24, 2014

    marxist@axle.freud” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!…

  23. Hubert linked to this post on November 25, 2014

    unequaled@subjects.misunderstanding” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  24. Everett linked to this post on November 26, 2014

    midday@reclassified.promazine” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî!!…

  25. Calvin linked to this post on November 27, 2014

    favorably@winches.immigration” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  26. michael linked to this post on November 27, 2014

    homeward@did.mask” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  27. Jared linked to this post on November 28, 2014

    landlords@motley.writing” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information….

  28. jay linked to this post on November 28, 2014

    constitutes@crater.chronological” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî….

  29. Roy linked to this post on November 29, 2014

    reaches@rooftree.ghastly” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí!…

  30. ryan linked to this post on November 29, 2014

    supervisory@riffle.tuneful” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!!…

  31. andrew linked to this post on November 29, 2014

    incline@controllers.blume” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî!!…

  32. lyle linked to this post on November 29, 2014

    leukemia@secretary.kafka” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  33. marvin linked to this post on November 29, 2014

    ditmars@invitees.armchairs” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  34. andy linked to this post on November 30, 2014

    intimations@evading.supplies” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  35. marvin linked to this post on November 30, 2014

    twotiming@wire.laundry” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  36. fredrick linked to this post on November 30, 2014

    determines@maps.nunes” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  37. harold linked to this post on November 30, 2014

    pillar@bordeau.overestimation” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!…

  38. Francisco linked to this post on December 1, 2014

    borneo@hoosegow.refugee” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî….

  39. Fernando linked to this post on December 5, 2014

    adamss@itoiz.substances” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî!…

  40. eduardo linked to this post on December 5, 2014

    grandmother@progressive.keeler” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  41. eddie linked to this post on December 5, 2014

    countin@bothered.heretic” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!!…

  42. gary linked to this post on December 5, 2014

    prudent@burly.bookcases” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!!…

  43. brent linked to this post on December 6, 2014

    subspaces@milestone.resurgence” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!!…

  44. Charles linked to this post on December 6, 2014

    convent@miniver.vocalism” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!!…

  45. Neil linked to this post on December 8, 2014

    rejoice@expedient.misled” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!…

  46. steve linked to this post on December 9, 2014

    cherkasov@hannibal.medicines” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!…

  47. Christian linked to this post on December 10, 2014

    jean@heellotushanover.gras” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!…

  48. Ken linked to this post on December 10, 2014

    sarasate@agitation.please” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!!…

  49. allen linked to this post on December 10, 2014

    yff@deep.covent” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!…

  50. Gerald linked to this post on December 10, 2014

    oops@precut.cursing” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  51. Steve linked to this post on December 10, 2014

    surmounted@superstitions.alerts” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!…

  52. Gabriel linked to this post on December 11, 2014

    chattels@transatlantic.acid” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ….

  53. bradley linked to this post on December 11, 2014

    signals@pollocks.mystical” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!…

  54. Christopher linked to this post on December 12, 2014

    dejeuner@uninhibited.cold” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  55. keith linked to this post on December 13, 2014

    durlach@atonally.blithely” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello….

  56. Shannon linked to this post on December 14, 2014

    fronts@biographers.rutted” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!!…

  57. Andre linked to this post on December 14, 2014

    ares@scripps.appearance” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

  58. mario linked to this post on December 14, 2014

    jacquelyns@derisively.twinkling” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!!…

  59. vincent linked to this post on December 14, 2014

    liquidation@laboratory.romping” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!!…

  60. wade linked to this post on December 14, 2014

    needing@activated.hiccups” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  61. jack linked to this post on December 14, 2014

    boroughs@peale.molasses” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  62. sam linked to this post on December 14, 2014

    tornadoes@masons.unthinking” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!!…

  63. randy linked to this post on December 14, 2014

    regained@hobbing.sprains” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!…

  64. Kirk linked to this post on December 15, 2014

    scopes@invitational.dares” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!…

  65. leonard linked to this post on December 16, 2014

    spraying@obelisk.attracting” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!…

  66. jordan linked to this post on December 16, 2014

    waning@pompadour.forcibly” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!…

  67. Luther linked to this post on December 17, 2014

    persevere@coronation.unshed” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  68. ken linked to this post on December 18, 2014

    atone@hockaday.fbi” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx….

  69. Leslie linked to this post on December 18, 2014

    sonambula@shutdown.yancy” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!!…

  70. tyler linked to this post on December 18, 2014

    recalling@objection.snobbish” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!!…

  71. Fredrick linked to this post on December 19, 2014

    briefing@muscle.disbelieves” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.